COURT DECISIONS

More Pages >  A | B | C |  E |  F | G | H | I |  J | K | L | M | N | O | P | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y 

Links to  websites for other sources of court decisions:

Malaysia Court Homepage - http://www.kehakiman.gov.my

Cases from Malaysia, Singapore and Other Jurisdictions - http://www.ipsofactoj.com

Tan Chin Swee & Anor V. Seri Ampangan Realty Sdn Bhd 24 JANUARY 2005  HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR  [ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO: S4-24-1986-2003]
 

CONTRACT: Specific performance - Sale and purchase agreement - Consent of contracting parties not given freely for the same purpose - Plaintiffs agreed to purchase corner unit property while defendant intended to sell end lot unit - Mutual mistake - Whether agreement rendered void - Contracts Act 1950, ss. 10(1), 13, 14, 21 - Corner unit already sold to a bona fide third party purchaser - Whether plaintiffs entitled to specific performance

CONTRACT: Mistake - Mutual mistake - Sale and purchase agreement - Parties at cross purposes as to subject matter of contract - Plaintiffs agreed to purchase corner unit property while defendant intended to sell end lot unit - Whether agreement rendered void - Contracts Act 1950, ss. 10(1), 13, 14, 21 - Order of specific performance

Tan Tien Seng & Ors v. Grobina Resorts Sdn Bhd 14 AUGUST 2002 - HIGH COURT [MELAKA]SAMAN PEMULA NO. 24-537 TAHUN 2000

Tan Tien Seng & Ors v. Grobina Resorts Sdn Bhd 14 JULY 2005 HIGH COURT MALAYA, MELAKA ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO: 24-537-2000
 

CONTRACT: Breach - Variation of Contract - Failure to build according to original design - Whether changes and deviations made required by 'appropriate authority' - Failure to call witnesses from 'appropriate authority' - Whether s. 114(g) Evidence Act 1950 applicable - Whether there was a breach going to the root of the Contract - Whether constituted a fundamental breach - Contracts Act 1950, s. 40 - Whether applicable

Tang Kam Thai & 133 Ors V. Langkah Cergas Sdn Bhd & 4 Ors 29 APRIL 2005 HIGH COURT [KUALA LUMPUR] GUAMAN SIVIL NO. S1-22-1351-2002
 

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Interim payment - Application for - Breach of sale and purchase Agreement - Delay in delivering vacant possession - Whether liquidated Damages to be paid - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 22A r. 3(1)(a),(e)

Thomas Iruthayam & Anor v. LSSC Development Sdn Bhd 10 MARCH 2005 HIGH COURT MALAYA, SHAH ALAM [ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO: MT(2) 1-24-942-1998]
 

CONTRACT: Building Contract - Breach - Failure by defendant to deliver vacant possession of Property to purchasers - Whether time of essence of Agreement - Whether plaintiffs had right of rescission - Whether plaintiffs entitled to refund and Damages - Contracts Act 1950, ss. 56 - Specific Relief Act 1950, s. 34
LAND LAW: Housing developers - Sale and purchase Agreement - Non-delivery of vacant possession - Whether time of essence of Agreement - Whether plaintiffs had right of rescission - Whether plaintiffs entitled to refund and Damages - Contracts Act 1950, ss. 56 - Specific Relief Act 1950, s. 34

Travelsight (M) Sdn Bhd & Anor V. Atlas Corporation Sdn Bhd 02 JANUARY 2003 - HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR [ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO: S6-24-4147-01]
 

CONTRACT: Rescission - Misrepresentation - Material representations pertaining to size of property and issue of approval of building plans - Plaintiff not employing own experts to ascertain truth of representations before executing agreement - Effect of - Whether misdescriptions substantial - Whether plaintiff entitled to rescind agreement
CONTRACT: Rescission - Building contract - Section 40, Contracts Act 1950- Obligation of restitution on part of party rescinding contract - Whether defendant estopped from reneging from its own agreement