| Ray of hope 
      for Bukit Gasing folk27/04/2009 The Star By YIP YOKE TENG
 
 RESIDENTS of Bukit Gasing are delighted that the High Court has granted 
      them leave to proceed with an application to nullify the development order 
      on a Bukit Gasing project issued on Oct 2, 2007 by the then Kuala Lumpur 
      mayor Ruslin Hassan.
 
 The application for leave was filed by residents and the Joint Action 
      Committee of Bukit Gasing (JACBG) in an effort to seek a public hearing on 
      the said development.
 
 The next hearing has been set for May 27.
 
 “We clearly believe that our call for justice has been heard by the 
      judge,” said JACBG committee member Gary Yeoh.
 
 “We demand from the City Hall our right to be heard, especially after the 
      tragedies at Bukit Antarabangsa, Bukit Ceylon and Jalan Semantan. We are 
      talking about 890 units in three condominium blocks, a 23million-litre 
      reservoir and Bukit Gasing that has a history of being geologically 
      unstable,” he added.
 
 Another resident Kamar Mohamed urged the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) and 
      new mayor Datuk Ahmad Fuad Ismail to act in accordance with the Prime 
      Minister’s call of “people first” and “performance now”.
 
 “We hope they won’t waste any more of the court’s time and show us 
      transparency in approving and executing projects,” he said.
 
 Lawyer R. Sivarasa, who represented the residents, said the judge had 
      ruled that the case was not vexatious and had therefore given the green 
      light.
 
 “Justice Lau Bee Lan sees this as a serious issue that needs to be 
      debated, agreeing that we have a point and the residents deserve to be 
      heard,” he said.
 
 He said the issue to be raised at the next hearing would be whether 
      residents in Kuala Lumpur had the right to be heard when a development 
      project took place near their houses.
 
 According to him, the local authority had denied the request for a public 
      hearing based on the Federal Territory Planning Act 1982, which stipulated 
      that such action was not required when the development did not involve 
      change of land use and density.
 
 “However, the rest of the country has the right to do so as stated in the 
      Town and Country Planning Act 1976 (Amendment) 2001, regardless of the 
      change of land use or density,” he said.
 
 In a press statement, the developer, Gasing Meridien Sdn Bhd (GMSB), said 
      it was concerned that Justice Lau “had left opened a matter of whether the 
      complainant had legal interest to apply for a judicial review of the 
      development order”, adding that it would work with its counsel to make 
      additional presentations at the next hearing.
 
 It reiterated that all approvals, including the Development Order, 
      Hoarding Permit and Earthworks Permit, had been obtained and that the 
      project had been reviewed by the Sensitivity Committee of the Federal 
      Territories Ministry, which comprised 13 agencies (including the Malaysian 
      Public Works Institute (Ikram), Selangor Department of Environment (JAS), 
      Mineral and Geosciences Department (JMG), Drainage and Irrigation 
      Department (JPS) and JKR Cerun).
 
 “Our development is not part of the forest reserve. Our land has been 
      privately titled with the express land use condition of ‘Bangunan’ since 
      1977 (well before any of the complainants came to live in the area). We 
      highlight that there has been no change in use or density,” the statement 
      reads.
 
 “The geology of the area is safe and sturdy. For almost two decades, it 
      has sustained not just many bungalows but even condominiums weighing over 
      64,000 tonnes each.
 
 “We highlight that in comparison the load per bungalow is less than 180 
      tonnes each.”
 |