| 
       HOUSE PURCHASE: Just scrap the 
    old system altogether  
    24/03/2009 NST 
    By : CHANG KIM LOONG for National House Buyers Association, Kuala Lumpur  
     
    The disadvantages of the sell-then-build system are obvious to all.  
     
    I REFER to the letter "Ministry must take a clear stand," (NST, March 18) 
    from S.K. of Kuala Lumpur.  
     
    I thank S.K. for the kind words in his letter. It is sentiments like these 
    that give our volunteers at the National House Buyers' Association the 
    strength and courage to keep going, despite all odds.  
     
    I wish to express our sympathy to S.K. for the predicament he is in. The 
    fact that there are hundreds of thousands of other house buyers suffering 
    the same fate is of no consolation to him at all. They are all victims of a 
    flawed system that had been allowed to operate for the past few decades.  
     
    The present sell-then-build system (STB) is creating havoc among naive and 
    unfortunate house buyers like S.K. Our view is that even a single case of 
    someone paying for a house and not getting it is one case too many. In other 
    words, anyone who buys and pays for his house must get his house.  
     
    Yet, with such a large number of abandoned housing projects, the authorities 
    still seem reluctant to depart from this nonsensical system and adopt the 
    build-then-sell (BTS) 10-90 system, which insulates buyers from the hazards 
    of abandoned projects.  
     
    What is more disturbing is that although the Housing Development (Control 
    and Licensing) Regulations have been amended and the minister of housing and 
    local government announced its implementation with effect from Dec 1, 2007, 
    the BTS 10-90 system, has been offered merely as an option for developers. 
    This means that the hazardous sell-then-build system is still very much 
    alive.  
     
    Of course, a few responsible developers have opted for the BTS 10-90.  
     
    Which developer would do business using their own funds when customers' 
    funds could be used? Which developer would carry the business risks when 
    there exists a system for the risks to be carried by the customers? If given 
    a choice, which developer would want to adopt the BTS 10-90?  
     
    Clearly, it is high time the authorities compelled all builders to abandon 
    the sell-then-build system and adopt the BTS system.  
     
    The minister has a lot of explaining to do but yet he remains silent.  |