This website is
 sponsored.gif

banner.gif

 Welcome    Main    Forum    FAQ    Useful Links    Sample Letters   Tribunal  

Confusion over proposed amendment to Valuers Act
The Star 12/9/2005

Property Talk: A weekly column by S.C. Cheah 

THERE has been strong opposition against the proposed amendment to the Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents Act 1981 that aims to regulate the property management profession. 

The opposing groups include the Malaysian Association for Shopping and Highrise Complex Management (PPK), the Real Estate & Housing Developers Association (REHDA), and the Property & Construction Committee of the Associated Chinese Chamber of Commerce & Industry Malaysia (ACCCIM). 

Elvin Fernandez

The group that is for the amendment includes the Board of Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents (BVAEA), Institution of Surveyors Malaysia (ISM), Association of Valuers and Property Consultants in Private Practice Malaysia (PEPS) and some local varsities.  

Critics feel that engaging registered valuers will create a layer of “unnecessary” fees to perform probably minimal work as the existing property management team, who may be non-valuers, are doing most of the work. Some quarters are also reluctant to have the BVAEA as the “regulator” and they prefer a deregulated state for the property management business. 

“Managing a shopping centre is not that easy. You have to be with the centre from Day 1, right from the planning stage and securing of tenants. What do the registered valuers know?” asked a property manager of a shopping centre. 

Others feel that the move by the BVAEA is tantamount to creating a “cartel” for its members. It is also felt that further regulation will not bode well with globalisation.  

There are also fears that professional bodies are becoming more “protective” and “monopolistic” of their turf. The recent move by the Bar Council to impose a no discount ruling on certain fees is a case in point. 

Although it may appear to be a separate issue, many property developers are unhappy, as they feel that all these may mean house buyers will have to pay more. 

Like it or not, the BVAEA is the present regulatory authority in Malaysia for property management, and it regulates the property management profession by way of the provisions of the Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents Act 1981, and the Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents Rules 1986 as amended. 

Under the Act and Rules, the BVAEA maintains a register each for the valuers and estate agents, and the practice of valuation and estate agency is permitted only if a registered valuer or estate agent practises through a firm that is a sole proprietorship, a partnership or body corporate. To practise as a property manager, a person must be registered under the Register of Valuation Firms that is maintained by the BVAEA. 

Properties in Mont Kiara enjoy good rental rates and capital appreciation partly because of good property management.

The Act exempts owners of buildings from registration for the purpose of undertaking their own in-house property management if no fees are charged. 

The crux of the matter falls on the word “fee”. This is because property management is defined in the Act as “...the management and control of any land, building and any interest therein, excluding the management of property-based businesses, on behalf of the owner for a fee and includes but is not limited to the following responsibilities...” 

They include monitoring outgoings and making payments out of the income from the property; preparing budgets and maintaining the financial records for the property; enforcing the terms of leases and other agreements pertaining to the property; and advising on sales and purchase, insurance and upgrading of the property. 

BVAEA board member Elvin Fernandez said the current confusion could be due to a lack of discussion as the two groups had met only once last year. 

“There is a real need for the two groups to meet to thrash it out,” he said, adding that there was no basis to oppose BVAEA's move to open a separate register for property managers through the proposed amendments, as this would now allow bona fide property managers to register themselves during the one-year grace period that would commence from the date the legislation took effect.  

“Those coming in after the one-year period may have to take exams. We want to see bona fide people who are practising as property managers to be registered. It is certainly not necessary for the BVAEA, with its glass on the property management issue already half full, to be replaced by another regulator under a different ministry. Calls for complete deregulation, which are made from time to time, are also not in the interest of creating a robust property management profession in Malaysia,” he said. 

On allegations that valuation companies would stand to benefit from the lucrative property management business, Fernandez, who is the managing director of Khong & Jaafar Sdn Bhd, said: “We manage some 10,000 units of condominium and five to six million sq ft of office space, but we make more (money) from valuation. Property management is the last of our area of work,” he said. 

He noted that a survey done five years ago showed that valuation firms managed about 25 million sq ft of office space and 100,000 condominium units. “This is quite big and is growing by the day,” he added.  

 

 

Main   Forum  FAQ  Useful Links  Sample Letters  Tribunal  

National House Buyers Association (HBA)

No, 31, Level 3, Jalan Barat, Off Jalan Imbi, 55100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: 03-21422225 | 012-3345 676 Fax: 03-22601803 Email: info@hba.org.my

© 2001-2009, National House Buyers Association of Malaysia. All Rights Reserved.