| 
     Not cracking under pressure
     
    24/04/2005
    
    NST By Ahirudin Attan
       
    CRACKS in the wall are a nuisance but one that Malaysian house-buyers and 
    house-owners are quite used to, and tolerant of.  
     
    But three ladies in a condo near Hospital Universiti in Petaling Jaya have 
    been having sleepless nights since the recent tremors, which they believed 
    caused cracks to appear on one side of the building. 
     
    The three quickly set up a "committee" to address the property developers 
    and the relevant council over the cracks. One of them, single and occupying 
    a unit on the 14th floor, said these are not the so-called "hairline" 
    cracks. "These are more than that, they are deep and ugly," she said. 
     
    At the same time, the ladies also discovered, while investigating the cracks 
    from different angles viewed from the ground, what they thought to be 
    evidence of potential cave-ins at the clearing at the back of the condo 
    building. 
     
    Inexperienced in how to deal with the authorities on cracks and cave-ins, 
    the ladies called City Hall which, surprisingly (since it's clearly outside 
    its jurisdiction), responded to the distress call. 
     
    An engineer from City Hall confirmed their fears — the cracks and the state 
    of the grounds look like they should be dealt with urgently. He also told 
    them that the correct authority to address their concerns would be the MPPJ, 
    the Petaling Jaya council. 
     
    This the ladies did hastily, driven by concern that their condo (and their 
    lives and those of their neighbours) could be in danger the longer they 
    waited. 
     
    From there on, their real problems started. Unlike City Hall, the ladies 
    said, MPPJ has been giving them excuses why they cannot send people to look 
    at the problem. 
     
    A lady officer said that "these things take time", that the council would 
    need to investigate the cracks and the grounds. If repairs are later found 
    to be necessary, the council would need to see if there was budget for such. 
     
    I told one of the ladies that perhaps they had brought the matter up with 
    the "wrong" officer. The lady on the 14th floor said they had got the 
    "right" officer. If MPPJ is so unwilling to help, I said, why not go to the 
    Press? They did threaten to go to the Press. That was when they encountered 
    their second and third problems. 
     
    The second problem involved some fellow residents. If the ladies thought 
    they were doing their neighbours a favour, they were in for a rude shock. 
     
    "One said we are trouble makers... that if we go to the Press, we are going 
    to push the value of our properties down," one of the ladies said. 
     
    But what's more important: your safety or how much you can get from selling 
    your unit? The ladies decided to go to the management of the condo, which is 
    linked to the developers. There their third problem awaited. 
     
    "The representative of the developer said if we go to the Press, they will 
    sue us. Can they do that? I — we — are only trying to do what we think is 
    right here." I told her not to crack under such pressure but to go to the 
    media with their predicament. She said she will do that. "But — touch wood — 
    if the condo collapses before that, you promise you will help dig us out?"   |